Cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1 and its use to differentiate osteoarthritis from rheumatoid arthritis and non-disease conditions

ABSTRACT

A method for differentiation of osteoarthritis from rheumatoid arthritis and non-disease conditions in a sample, comprising measuring in the sample the concentration of human cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 (CILP-2) in body fluids and more specifically, measuring in the sample the concentration of the N-terminal part of CILP-2 (2C1) or fragments thereof.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/728,857 filed Mar. 27, 2007 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,812,125.

FIELD OF INVENTION

The present invention relates to a method aiding in the assessment of osteoarthritis (OA). The method especially is used in assessing the absence or presence of osteoarthritis. The method is for example practiced by analyzing biochemical markers, comprising measuring in a sample the concentration of human cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 (CILP-2) in body fluids and correlating the concentrations determined to the absence or presence of osteoarthritis. More specifically, the present invention is related to the N-terminal part or cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1 or fragments thereof. This invention also describes development of diagnostic and prognostic assays for differentiation of osteoarthritis from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and non-disease conditions.

BACKGROUND

Arthritis is a group of conditions that affect the health of the joints in the body, including rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis, which are autoimmune diseases; septic arthritis, caused by joint infection; and the more common osteoarthritis. Unlike the autoimmune diseases, osteoarthritis largely affects older people and results from the degeneration of joint cartilage.

Osteoarthritis is the most common form of arthritis affecting a large part of the population. Although osteoarthritis can affect almost any joint, it most often affects the hands, knees, hips, and spine. Common symptoms include pain, stiffness, loss of joint motion, and changes in the shape of affected joints. It is frequently called degenerative joint disease or “wear and tear” arthritis. Although it can be brought on suddenly by an injury, its onset is generally gradual; aging brings on a breakdown in cartilage, and pain gets progressively more severe, although in early stages it can be relieved with rest. Dull, throbbing nighttime pain is characteristic, and it may be accompanied by muscle weakness or deterioration. Symptoms usually appear after the age of 50 and progress slowly. Starting with joint pain, the condition progresses and eventually the joint becomes deformed, limiting movement. As the cartilage breaks down it leaves the bone exposed altering gait. Later stages of the disease have been shown to have a component of inflammation, where the process in the cartilage may have a role in stimulating this inflammation. The condition is believed to be initiated by excessive or unusual load on the joint, where overweight, poor posture, repetitive strain from work, injury, sports injury or a combination of these factors are known to increase the risk.

Osteoarthritis also includes new production of tissue structures, particularly evident in the form of the so-called osteophytes that are new structures formed by endochondral bone formation. Although mechanical factors appear to have a role in both disease initiation and progression, little is known about specific events, partly due to the lack of diagnostic procedures that can identify those early stages of the disease. Patients usually seek care due to pain and the joint malfunction late in disease development, when cartilage destruction has already advanced significantly.

Today there is no single sign, symptom, or test result that allows a definitive diagnosis of osteoarthritis. Instead, the diagnosis is based on consideration of several factors, including presence of the characteristic signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis and the results of laboratory tests and x-rays, criteria set by The American College of Rheumatology (ACR).

Radiographs can usually confirm the diagnosis of osteoarthritis, although the findings are nonspecific. The cardinal radiographic features of the disease are loss of joint space and presence of new bone formation or osteophytes. The association between joint pain and radiographic features of osteoarthritis is not very close, such that even joints with pathologic or radiographic evidence of this disease may remain asymptomatic. Another shortcoming of using radiography for depicting the level of cartilage destruction in OA, particularly for the knee, is the necessity to have the exact angle of the X-rays for a correct measure of the joint space. Diagnosis using X-rays is used several years after the onset of the injury, whereas bio-markers, such as cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1 and fragments thereof can be used much earlier for proper diagnosis.

It is not clear what the underlying process in the progressive tissue destruction of osteoarthritis is, but there are clear events of breakdown of the major tissue macromolecules caused by increased proteolytic activity. It has been shown that the early event in this progressive tissue destruction is degradation of aggrecan (a proteoglycan that is a major structural component of cartilage), where five specific sites along the molecule can be cleaved by the so-called aggrecanases (ADAMTS-4 and 5). However, the normal levels of aggrecan are adapted to e.g. altered mechanical load on the cartilage in a process that involves cleavage of the molecule at the typical sites and by the same ADAMTS-enzymes. There is fragmentation of collagen accomplished by specific collagenases and other enzymes that will degrade major molecules like cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP).

In the process of osteoarthritis some of the fragments that are produced are no longer retained in the tissue and are released into the surrounding body fluids and may eventually reach the circulation. New technology is based on measuring such fragments in body fluids as an indicator of the active process leading to tissue destruction. This molecular marker technology offers possibilities for new diagnostic procedures. These have the potential to detect much earlier events in the tissue destruction than is possible with the currently used approaches. It has been observed that when increased levels of circulating COMP fragments that have been released into synovial fluid eventually reach the blood, they can be used as a prognostic indicator of the process that will lead to destruction of the articular cartilage as observed by x-ray imaging. Although the processes in the diseases of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis are different, it appears that the serum COMP levels have a prognostic value in both cases.

One limitation in evaluating the significance of altered COMP-levels in body fluids is the difficulty in distinguishing whether the majority of the COMP detected originates from normal turnover or disease progression. Other indicators that have been utilized include the C-terminal telo-peptide released upon cleavage of collagen type II, (referred to as CTX-II). Other assays directly measure new ends within the original polypeptide chain that are formed when collagen type II is cleaved by collagenases. An assay directed at the repair phase makes use of release of the C-terminal propeptide of collagen type II (CP-II) when procollagen is processed for collagen fibrillogenesis. This propeptide is apparently not retained in the cartilage. The inventors have found that procedures to measure release of aggrecan fragments have limited use, since the major fragments containing the negatively charged chondroitin sulfate chains appear to be largely eliminated in the lymph nodes without reaching the circulation. However, measurements of aggrecan fragments in synovial fluid from patients with early rheumatoid arthritis have proven to identify those patients that develop more extensive cartilage destruction over a 10 year period (1).

One obvious shortcoming of all these markers is the lack of specificity for a given joint disease and overlap of measured levels between samples from normal individuals and those with joint disease. Furthermore there is no or little distinction observed between cases with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis with any of these indicators. Only a portion of patients show values sufficiently elevated to clearly distinguish them from normal individuals (2).

One issue is that there is a continuous turnover of tissue structural molecules in response to regular and frequent load. This serves to adapt tissue function to new requirements, including removing fatigued tissue elements. One consequence of this turnover is that there is a continuous release of fragments generated by these normal cleavages. In assays used today of fragments as molecular indicators there is little distinction between those generated by normal turnover and those generated by a pathological process. Thus there is a high background, which hampers the ability to detect an increased pathological molecular process. It is however possible that some of the collagen type II (collagen, abundant in articular cartilage) breakdown products may distinguish more clearly between normal and pathological events, even if the process may be induced by the same enzyme. This is possible since normal collagen turnover as shown for articular cartilage is orders of magnitude slower than for other matrix constituents.

As used herein, the proteins where cartilage Intermediate Layer Protein precursor is referred to as CILP-1 and CILP-2 respectively. The N-terminal part that we study is referred to as cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1, which is distinct from cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C2.

Cartilage intermediate layer protein (CILP), a large secreted glycoprotein (3-6) is thought to play a role in cartilage scaffolding (7) has also been claimed to have nucleoside triphosphate pyrophosphohydrolase [NTPPPH] activity (8-11). The expression of CILP appears to be largely restricted to cartilage (3, 4, 9, 11, 12). The amount of CILP protein increases in aging human articular cartilage, and CILP is one of only a few cartilage matrix proteins whose expression becomes markedly up-regulated in early osteoarthritis (4). In normal cultured porcine chondrocytes, transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ1) induces CILP expression, whereas insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) suppresses CILP expression (10). The originally detected CILP, is now referred to as cartilage intermediate layer protein 1 C1 (UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entry O75339).

In the nucleotide sequence of a protein cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 (CILP-2 was deposited in the Genbank sequence databank (Accession AF542080, year 2002). The first study of the protein CILP-2 appeared in 2003 (13), when it was found that it did not show nucleotide pyrophosphatase phosphodiesterase(NPP)activity (13).

CILP-2 has a 50% homology to CILP-1 and their data indicate that it is similarly cleaved into corresponding cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1 and cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C2. (UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entry Q8IUL8). From proteomics approaches both proteins are found in cartilage extracts.

In recent work we have shown upregulation in both early and late stages of osteoarthritis of production of COMP, fibronectin and at the same time new protein that we characterized and named CILP, now cartilage intermediate layer protein 1 C1 (3, 4, 16).

The peptide covering the amino acids 21-709 (SEQ ID NO: 1), of the human CILP-2 has now by the inventors of this patent application surprisingly been shown to be a marker which can be used to for differentiation of osteoarthritis from rheumatoid arthritis and non-disease conditions.

Studies implicate CILP (cartilage intermediate layer protein 1 C1) as an autoantigen in patients with osteoarthritis (14, 15). There are no studies known to indicate that cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1 may be altered in osteoarthritis. No article or patent could be found to show or suggest that cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1 or fragments thereof, may be used in the diagnosis of osteoarthritis.

Work by Du et al 2005 (14) implicated that a small proportion of patients with knee osteoarthritis had auto antibodies to CILP (cartilage intermediate layer protein 1 C1). Antibodies were only detected in 25/136 of the osteoarthritis patients. Similarly Tsuruha et al. 2001 (7) detected only 8-10.5% antibodies to different regions of CILP (cartilage intermediate layer protein 1 C1). No studies have been reported to indicate antibodies to cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1 or fragments thereof, the protein that is the topic of this invention.

In U.S. Pat. No. 6,124,095 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,251,389 assigned to Incyte, CILP-2 and polynucleotide encoding CILP-2 are disclosed. In these patents, the protein is denominated human nucleotide pyrophosphohydrolase-2 (NTPPH-2), but the NTPPH-2 sequence is identical to CILP-2. They noted the expression of NTPPH-2 in rheumatoid and osteoarthritic synovial capsule. This patent does not describe the possibility of using NTPPH-2 for selective identification of osteoarthritis patients. The same applicant has a granted patent (U.S. Pat. No. 5,876,963) on CILP-1 (NTPPH-1) and polynucleotide encoding NTPPH-1.

DE 10328033 (S. Blaess) describes chip carrying DNA sequences associated with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis e.g. for diagnosis, monitoring and drug development. They do not mention cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1.

WO03/054166 (Incyte) describes methods for determining susceptibility of an individual, preferably an osteoarthritis patient, to joint space narrowing and/or osteophyte development and/or joint pain comprising identifying whether the individual has at least one polymorphism in a polynucleotide encoding a protein, one of many proteins mentioned is CILP. However they do not mention cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1.

WO02/095415 and WO01/38872 (Osteometer Biotech) both describe an assay for the diagnosis of the severity of osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis comprising detecting an isomerized or optically inverted protein or fragment of a protein in a sample. Neither the fragment described in WO02/095415 or protein WO01/38872 is from cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1.

WO01/20018 (Univ. of California) describes a method for identifying a risk for an arthritic disorder, e.g. osteoarthritis, comprising comparing the level of at least one indicator, e.g. NTPPH, of altered mitochondrial function in a biological sample with a control sample.

Proper diagnosis of osteoarthritis is currently possible only at advanced disease and depends on X-ray and clinical investigations. In the case of rheumatoid arthritis destruction of the joint cartilage can only be determined at advanced stages by X-ray.

RA can worsen very quickly in its early stages and serious damage to the joints may occur in as short a time span as 24 months. When modern, effective treatments for RA, such as blocking TNF-α activity are initiated early, symptoms can be relieved and the worsening of joint destruction slowed, and early disability can be avoided.

There is no documented disease modifying treatment of osteoarthritis. At present, no cure is available and treatment focuses on relieving pain. Common treatments include the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID's), which are often used to relieve pain Compounds such as chondroitin and glucosamine are thought to improve the cartilage itself, but well controlled studies remain an important focus.

In severe cases, joint replacement often becomes necessary. In a few cases joints may be fused. This procedure stops the pain, but results in permanent loss of joint function. Another treatment, not yet used for fully developed osteoarthritis, includes the transplantation of cultured autologous chondrocytes. If the condition persists without correction and/or therapy, the joint is destroyed, leading to major replacement surgery with total prosthesis, or to disability.

Thus, to introduce new therapeutic regimens that may stop the early stages of disease development, new, early and correct diagnosis is of essence and would provide a breakthrough. For this reason the inventors of this application attempted to develop an assay that can be used as an indicator for developing osteoarthritis, as well as for differentiation of osteoarthritis from rheumatoid arthritis as well as a normal joint.

In early experiments the inventors could show that cartilage intermediate layer protein 1 C1, although upregulated in osteoarthritis, including both the early and late stages, did not show a marked increase in synovial fluid from patients with osteoarthritis and was not significantly different in fluid from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Upon proceeding to develop an assay for cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1, we surprisingly showed that this protein acted as an indicator that showed unexpected and uniquely elevated levels in osteoarthritis. Levels in serum and synovial fluid are highly elevated and show no overlap with samples from rheumatoid arthritis and normal individuals. This is the first time that an assay for any protein released from a tissue have shown such a difference between samples representing different joint disease categories. The invention herein provides a novel diagnostic and prognostic assay for the detection of the osteoarthritic process prior to as well as at the time when diagnosis can be established. Other objects and advantages will be more fully apparent from the following disclosure and appended claims.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention provides a method for differentiation of osteoarthritis from rheumatoid arthritis and non-disease conditions in a sample, comprising measuring in the sample the concentration of the cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1 protein or fragments thereof.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a graph depicting the levels of CILP 2C1 protein in ng/ml in samples obtained from normal control serum from blood donors (black triangles), serum from patients with osteoarthritis (black squares) and serum samples from patients with knee joint rheumatoid arthritis (black diamonds). Competitive ELISA, using a specific antibody to CILP 2C1, was used to analyze the serum samples. The Microwin 200 software program was used to evaluate the absorbance values obtained at 450 nm and to calculate the content of CILP 2C1 in the samples. Each point represents the mean of duplicate measurements corresponding to each patient.

FIG. 2 is a graph depicting the levels of CILP 2C1 protein in ng/ml in knee joint synovial fluid samples obtained from patients with osteoarthritis (black squares) and synovial fluid from patients with knee joint rheumatoid arthritis (black diamonds). Competitive ELISA, using a specific antibody to CILP 2C1, was used to analyze the samples. The Microwin 200 software program was used to evaluate the absorbance values obtain at 450 nm and to calculate the content of CILP 2C1 in the samples. Each point represents the mean of two determinations corresponding to each patient.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION AND PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS THEREOF

The work with respect to the invention herein is based on early data on cartilage intermediate layer protein 1 C1, which we identified as one of a few proteins showing a major increase in osteoarthritis. Our first attempt with our antibody raised against the protein purified from the tissue was promising indicating that the protein was released into the synovial fluid from osteoarthritis patients and that the highest level was found in a sample from an osteoarthritis patient.

Work with the recombinant cartilage intermediate layer protein 1 C1 produced in EBNA 293 fibroblasts confusingly showed that this pure protein as the coating antigen in ELISA did not result in good inhibition levels with synovial fluid samples. At this time cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 appeared in the databases and we suspected that there was a contamination of antibodies to this protein in our preparation. We therefore developed a specific antibody to cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1, and have now used this to develop an assay for fragments of this protein in synovial fluid and serum. This assay turned out to be very promising and analyses of serum samples from normal individuals as well as patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis gave the results depicted in FIG. 1.

The results showed that the levels cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1 were much higher in osteoarthritis compared to both rheumatoid arthritis and normal individuals, with no overlap. This is the first time that an assay has shown such a difference between samples representing different joint disease categories for any protein released from a tissue.

Serum and synovial fluid samples from twelve patients with clinically established rheumatoid arthritis according to the ACR-criteria (all with knee joint arthritis), twelve patients with clinically established knee joint osteoarthritis according to the clinical and radiographic ACR-criteria and twelve normal control serum samples from blood donors were analyzed with the established ELISA procedure. A central observation was that the levels of cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1 or fragments thereof were distinctly higher in the samples from patients with osteoarthritis, with no significant overlap to levels in the normal individuals, which in turn showed levels very similar to those in samples from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The patients with osteoarthritis showed a wider range of considerably higher levels demonstrating that the release of increased levels of cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1 was a common denominator for this group.

The results show a unique difference in molecular marker levels between different conditions affecting the joint. Interestingly abundant data show that COMP levels in serum show elevated levels both in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Therefore ratios between COMP and cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1 distinguish individuals with rheumatoid arthritis from those normal, particularly in the subgroup of patients that appeared to show subnormal levels of cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1 or its fragments.

The results show a novel molecular marker that has the potential to serve in the diagnosis of conditions with osteoarthritis. Levels of cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1 are distinctly higher than in normal individuals and in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The difference between levels in normal individuals and those with osteoarthritis indicate that the assay of cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1 also serves as an indicator of existing disease activity. The wide range of values in patient samples indicates that the level correlates to the intensity of the process. Samples that may be analyzed by the method of the invention include synovial fluid, blood, plasma, serum and urine.

Example 1 Preparation of the Antigen and Antiserum

A synthetic peptide within the amino acids 21-709 (SEQ ID NO: 1), of the human CILP-2 (GeneBank accession nr. Q8IUL8) was used as immunogen. An additional cysteine residue was added at the amino termini to allow selective coupling to different substrates. The peptide sequence (SEQ ID NO:1) was used as immunogen after conjugation in its N-terminal via an added cysteine to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) for the production of polyclonal antibodies according to standard protocols. Any fragment in the range of amino acids 21-709, of the human cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1 could be used as an immunogen.

A commercial source (Innovagen AB, Lund, Sweden) was used for the synthesis of the peptide, the conjugation to a carrier, the preparation of the antigen for immunization, including the injection to the rabbit and the production of the antiserum.

Example 2 Purification of the Anti Peptide Antibody from the Crude Antiserum

The generated antiserum was affinity purified on a column with the immobilized cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1 peptide, (Innovagen AB, Lund, Sweden). The column (1.5 ml gel) was equilibrated with phosphate buffered saline (PBS, 0.1 M phosphate buffer, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5) and 5 ml of serum were applied and incubated end over end for 1 hour at room temperature then further incubated for 1 hour without mixing. The column was washed with 15 and then with 10 ml PBS containing 1 M NaCl. The column was eluted step wise with 1.5 ml of 100 mM Glycine pH 2.7. Ten fractions were collected and neutralized immediately with 50 μl 1M Tris pH 9.5. Fractions with the highest absorbance were pooled and dialyzed against PBS containing 0.05% sodium azide. After dialysis the volume was measured and the concentration of the IgG was determined by it OD at 280 nm. The affinity purified antibody, stored frozen at −20° C. in 200 μl aliquots, was used in all the assays.

Example 3 Competitive Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) for Cartilage Intermediate Layer Protein 2 C1

A specific competitive ELISA was developed to measure human cartilage intermediate layer 2 C1 in body fluids.

1. Biotinylation of the peptides: Peptides were biotinylated via their terminal cysteine with EZ-LINK® Maleimide PEO₂-Biotin as described by the manufacturer (PIERCE).

2. Pre-treatment of the antibody: The affinity purified peptide antibody was diluted 1:50 in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4 containing 5% n,n-dimethylformamide (Sigma-Aldrich). After incubation for 1 hour at room temperature the antibody was diluted to 1:2000 with 4% Triton in 10 mM phosphate (NaH₂PO₄) pH 7.5.

3. Pre-treatment of the standard and samples: Standard (from 1 to 125 ng/ml) in 1% (w/v) sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (SDBS, Sigma-Aldrich) in 0.1 M sodium chloride, 0.05 M sodium phosphate pH 7.5 containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma-Aldrich) and an appropriate dilution of synovial fluids or sera in 1% (w/v) SDBS solution without BSA were incubated overnight at room temperature.

4. Assay: 96-well microtiter plates (Nunc-Immunoplates, Maxisorp, Nunc Intermed Ltd, Copenhagen, Denmark) were coated overnight at room temperature in a wet chamber with 50 μl of streptavidin (IMMUNOPURE® Streptavidin, PIERCE) in PBS pH 7.4. After rinsing the plates with 0.15 M sodium chloride and 0.05% (w/v) Tween 20 the free binding sites of the polystyrene surface were blocked with 80 μl of 2 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS, pH 7.4 for 1 hour at room temperature. Then biotinylated peptide diluted 1:10000 was added and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature.

Thirty microliters of pre-treated standard (from 1 to 125 ng/ml) and samples of synovial fluids or sera (obtained by usual puncture) were mixed with 30 μl of diluted antibody. After 1 hour preincubation at room temperature 50 μl of the mixture was added to the coated wells of the microtiter plate and further incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. The plates were rinsed as above and the bound antibodies were detected by adding 50 μl of a dilution of rabbit anti-swine IgG conjugated with alkaline phosphatase (DAKO A/S, Denmark) in 0.1 M sodium chloride, 0.05 M sodium phosphate, 0.05% Tween 20, pH 7.5 containing 2 mg/ml of BSA. After 1 hour incubation at room temperature the plates were rinsed as above and 50 μl of substrate was added (1 mg/ml p-nitrophenyl phosphate in 1M diethanolamine pH 9.8 containing 0.5 M MgCl₂).

The absorbance of each sample and standard was measured at 405 nm in duplicate by a microplate reader (Expert96, AsysHitech, Austria). The Mikrowin 200 software program (AsysHitech, Austria) was used to plot the calibration curve and to calculate the content of CILP-2 in the samples analyzed.

Example 4 Study Design

Twelve patients with clinically established knee joint rheumatoid arthritis according to the ACR-criteria, 12 patients with clinically established knee joint osteoarthritis according to the ACR-criteria and 12 normal control serum samples from blood donors were analyzed with the established ELISA procedure, with the results shown in FIG. 1.

REFERENCES

-   1. Saxne T, Wollheim F, Pettersson H, Heinegåard D. Brit.     Proteoglycan concentration in synovial fluid: predictor of future     cartilage destruction in rheumatoid arthritis. Med. J. (1987), 295,     1447-1448.) -   2. Lindqvist E, Eberhardt K, Bendtzen K. Heinegård D, Saxne T. Ann     Rheum Dis. Prognostic laboratory markers of joint damage in     rheumatoid arthritis. (2005) 64, 196-201. -   3. Lorenzo P, Neame P, Sommarin Y, Heinegård D. Cloning and deduced     amino acid sequence of a novel cartilage protein (CILP) identifies a     perform including a nucleotide pyrophosphohydrolase. J Biol Chem     1998; 273:23469-75. -   4. Lorenzo P, Bayliss M T, Heinegård D: A novel cartilage protein     (CILP) present in the mid-zone of human articular cartilage     increases with age. J Biol Chem 1998; 273:23463-8. -   5. Lorenzo P, Aman P, Sommarin Y, Heinegård D. The human CILP gene:     exon/intron organization and chromosomal mapping. Matrix Biol 1999;     18:445-54. -   6. Nakamura I, Okawa A, Ikegawa S, Takaoka K, Nakamura Y. Genomic     organization, mapping, and polymorphisms of the gene encoding human     cartilage intermediate layer protein. J Hum Genet. 1999; 44:203-5. -   7. Tsuruha J, Masuko-Hongo K, Kato T, Sakata M, Nakamura H,     Nishioka K. Implication of cartilage intermediate layer protein in     cartilage destruction in subsets of patients with osteoarthritis and     rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44:838-45. -   8. Masuda I, Hamada J-I, Haas A, Ryan L, McCarty D. A unique     ectonucleotide pyrophosphohydrolase associated with porcine     chondrocyte-derived vesicles. J Clin Invest 1995; 95:699-704. -   9. Masuda I, Halligan B D, Barbieri J T, Haas A L, Ryan L M, McCarty     D J. Molecular cloning and expression of a porcine chondrocyte     nucleotide pyrophosphohydrolase. Gene 1997; 197:277-87. -   10. Hirose J, Masuda I, Ryan L M. Expression of cartilage     intermediate layer protein/nucleotide pyrophosphohydrolase parallels     the production of extracellular inorganic pyrophosphate in response     to growth factors and with aging. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43:2703-11. -   11. Masuda I, Iyama K-I, Halligan B D, Barbieri J T, Haas A L,     McCarty D J, et al. Variations in site and levels of expression of     chondrocyte nucleotide pyrophosphohydrolase with aging. J Bone Miner     Res 2001; 16:868-75. -   12. Johnson K, Hashimoto S, Lotz M, Pritzker K, Goding J,     Terkeltaub R. Up-regulated expression of the phosphodiesterase     nucleotide pyrophosphatase family member PC-1 is a marker and     pathogenic factor for knee meniscal cartilage matrix calcification.     Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44:1071-81. -   13. Johnson K., Farley D., Hu S., Terkeltaub R. One of Two     Chondrocyte-Expressed Isoforms of Cartilage Intermediate-Layer     Protein Functions as an Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 Antagonist.     Arthritis Rheum Vol. 48, No. 5, May 2003, pp 1302-1314. -   14. Du H., Masuko-Hongo K., Nakamura H., Xiang Y., Bao C-D., Wang     X-D., Chen S-L., Nishioka K., Kato T. The prevalence of     autoantibodies against cartilage intermediate layer protein, YKL-39,     osteopontin, and cyclic citrullinated peptide in patients with     early-stage knee osteoarthritis: evidence of a variety of autoimmune     processes. Rheumatology international, (2005 November) Vol. 26, No.     1, pp. 35-41. Electronic Publication: 2004-09-18. -   15. Kato Tomohiro; Xiang Yang; Nakamura Hiroshi; Nishioka Kusuki.     Neoantigens in osteoarthritic cartilage. Current opinion in     rheumatology, (2004 September) Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 604-8. -   16. Lorenzo P, Bayliss M, Heinegård D. Altered patterns and     synthesis of extracellular matrix macromolecules in early     osteoarthritis. Matrix Biol. (2004) 23, 381-91). 

The invention claimed is:
 1. A method for differentiating an individual with osteoarthritis from an individual with rheumatoid arthritis and a normal individual without osteoarthritis in a sample from the individual, comprising measuring in the sample the concentration of cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1 (SEQ ID NO: 1) performing a specific competitive ELISA technique with a specific antibody to cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1 (SEQ ID NO:1); correlating the concentration of cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1 (SEQ ID NO:1) in the sample with the absence or presence of osteoarthritis by determining that the concentration of cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1 (SEQ ID NO:1) in the sample from the individual is higher than in a normal control sample; and applying the information on the concentration of cartilage intermediate layer protein 2 C1 (SEQ ID NO:1) to enable correct treatment of the individual for osteoarthritis.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the sample is selected from the group consisting of synovial fluid, blood, plasma, serum and urine. 